If you read the very first paragraph of every single review over the last few years I am sure you cannot fail to notice we state right above the score the following:

“Note, this review follows our new scoring guidelines for 2021 which you can read up on here.”

Did you click on the link and read it? Because if you did you will read that all scores in the current calendar year are titled Editorial Score meaning our reviewer score and the reviews in all previous years are called “Score” or reader scores and are determined by the reader themselves using the voting slider above the score. Something you yourself can do as well.

Thank you

Thanks for this, looks like a typo, should be 3100, not 3000 but I want to have a look at their mention of eliminating the supplementary opposed magnets also. Will ask them

Great review. Thanks.

One thing you may want to clear up though, regarding the Solitaire P.

You say: This is a single-sided magnet design as opposed to the TPM 3000’s dual-sided magnet application

T+A say: This design also eliminates the need for supplementary opposed magnets.

Can these statements be reconciled? The t+a website now refers to the Solitaire P having a TPM 3100 so maybe the spec changed?